Nix-the-Nine Campaign


Nix-the-Nine Directory of Resources

 
 
Susan Kirsch, founder of the Nix the Nine Campaign, has been a guest, numerous times, on the Morning Show with hostess Marcia Macomber on Sonoma radio station KSVY 91.3 FM. (KSVY.org). To listen to her discussions, click on the Morning Show link.

 

Defeat nine housing bills that benefit developers but harm communities

Protect single-family neighborhoods and sovereignty

Nix the Nine Success: Four bills defeated, three bills didn't make it out of the Senate.  

Two were Signed by the Governor!

 

 July 1 - Nix the Nine Campaign commences.
9. July 31 - AB1279 - held in Committee đź‘Ž
8. August 11 - SB1385 - failed in Committeeđź‘Ž
7. August 13 - AB3040 - held in Suspenseđź‘Ž
6. August 20 - SB902 - held in Committeeđź‘Ž
5. August 31 - SB995 - didn't make it out of the Senateđź‘Ž
4. August 31 - SB1085 - didn't make it out of the Senateđź‘Ž
3. August 31 - SB1120 - didn't make it out of the Senate đź‘Ž
2. August 31 - AB725 - signed into law by the Governor
1. August 31 - AB2345 - signed into law by the Governor  
 
Tuesday, September 1, 2020 two bills (AB725 and AB2345) made it through the Legislature to the Governor's desk.  Nix the Nine Campaign sent a letter to the Governor Asking him to Veto these two housing bills.

Monday, September 28, 2020
Governor Newsom 
 
       
About the Nine Bills
        
            List of the Nine Bills   - (now five - AB1279, AB3040, SB902 and SB1385 have been NIXED.)
           
            Analysis of the bills: link Embarcadero Institute.
            
            Nix the Nine Power Point.

            What are the nine bills and their impact?


                  
Resources (Links to Articles)
 
            Richard Halstead, Marin IJ, January 29, 2021 - Marin Supervisors push back against huge housing mandate.
 
             Raymond G. Lorber, Marin IJ, September 15, 2020 - Reader's Forum, Newsom shouldn't sign last two housing bills.  

            Susan Kirsch, Marin Post, September 13, 2020 - Federal YIMBY Act, Targets Local Control.

            Dan Walters, Marin IJ, September 6, 2020 - State's dominant Democrats bickering despite control.
 
            Louis Hansen, Bay Area News Group, September 5, 2020 - California's housing priorities fall amid coronavirus chaos.

            Marc L. Verville, Santa Monica Architects for a Responsible Tomorrow, Marin Post,
 August 24, 2020 - Losing Our City
 
            T. Keith Gurnee, August 22, 2020 - Scott Wiener: A Relentless Campaign Against Family Communities.
 
           Dick Spotswood, Marin IJ, August 18, 2020 - Proposed housing bills put critical spotlight on McGuire.

            Susan Kirsch, Marin Post, August 16, 2020 - Appropriate, Appropriate, Appropriations
        
           Sharon Rushtin, Marin Post, August 16, 2020 - Misguided Housing Bill bans Single-Family homes forever
 
          Susan Kirsch. Marin Post, August 2, 2020, Legislator Betrayal.
 
         Silicon Valley Association of Republican Women Reject Harmful Housing Bills, August 14,         2020, https://www.svarw.com/whats-hot-2
        
        
          Thomas D. Elias, Napa Valley Register, July 27, 2020, Nine-bill housing package derails local choices.
 
          Jeannie Bruins, Damon Connolly and Gina Papan, Nix the Nine Campaign, July 22, 2020,  Hats off to three MTC Commissioners. 
    
       
 
           Ileana Wachtel, Santa Monica Daily Press, July 21, 2020, Housing Bills Will Bring Upheaval to Family Homes, Zoning and Local Plans,

     

           Raymond G. Lorber, Marin IJ, July 20, 2020, Resist the 9 proposed state Legislature bills harmful to single-family housing.

          T. Keith Gurnee. Fox and Hounds, July 14, 2020, Say Goodbye to your Neighborhoods.

          Susan Kirsch. Marin Post, July 12, 2020, Nix the Nine - Act Now. 

         Susan Kirsch. Marin Post, July 5, 2020, Remedy for Harmful Housing Policy.
        
         Bob Silvestri. Marin Post, June 30, 2022, The Camel is inside the tent – SB 35 and Novato’s “New Urbanism”.
        
        William Ross. The Tyee, January 18, 2018, Why the ‘Housing Crisis’ Is Really About Globalization.

        
Resources (Links to News)
 
 https://www.dailynews.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/08/OCR-L-BUBBLEINVENTORY-0413-01-1.jpg?w=862
 
        The LA Daily News, August 10, 2020 
                    Sacramento's coming war on neighborhoods.
 
         The Washington Post, August 6, 2020
        On Monday, August 3 at 9 AM Susan Kirsch was interviewed by Sonoma Valley's KSVY
        radio host Marcia Macomber about the Nix-the-Nine Campaign, housing, and community                      organizing. Listen to the program at the online archives: http://ksvy.org/public-archive.

  

        Silicon Valley Association of Republican Women, Make Calls today, August 4, 2020.
        A MESSAGE FROM THE PALO ALTANS, August 3, 2020.
 
        A MESSAGE FROM A BETTER CUPERTINO,  August, 2, 2020.  

       Board. Embarcadero Institute, July 19 2019.

      Hawaiian Senator Stanley Chang, July 15, 2020.

  Zoom Call PowerPoint Presentations

           ZOOM Meeting July 8, 2020  
 
 
          ZOOM Meeting August 5, 2020  
        ZOOM Meeting September 16, 2020

        
 
     
        

        


        
 
     
information: Susan Kirsch, Chair, Nix the Nine Campaign


Marin Supervisors Push Back against huge state housing mandate

 

Marin supervisors push back against huge state housing mandate

Only Mill Valley, Corte Madera built enough during last 8 years to be exempt

PUBLISHED: | UPDATED:

Marin supervisors said this week they are gravely concerned about a looming state mandate to build over 14,000 new housing units throughout the county between 2022 and 2030.

“Marin County recognizes the need for more affordable housing. We are pursuing a number of strategies to achieve that goal,” Supervisor Damon Connolly said. “But residents are justified in being alarmed by these numbers that we’re seeing out of the state.

“Marin is not alone,” Connolly said. “Jurisdictions both large and small from around the region are pushing back. Most recently even San Francisco.”

Connolly made his comments after county supervisors were briefed Tuesday about the status of the mandates.

Every eight years, the California Department of Housing and Community Development estimates the number of new homes the Bay Area needs to create, and how affordable those homes need to be, to meet the housing needs of people at all income levels.

The Association of Bay Area Governments (ABAG) then assigns a share of the region’s housing need to each city, town and county in the region. Each local government must then update its general plan to show where the housing can be built.

Under the plan currently moving forward, the state is requiring Bay Area jurisdictions to create over 441,000 housing units from 2022 to 2030, more than twice the 187,000 units it directed Bay Area jurisdictions to zone for from 2015 to 2023.

The number of units assigned to Marin County’s unincorporated area alone increased over 1,700% from 185 units in the previous cycle to 3,510 for the next cycle. Of that total, 1,063 are to be priced for people with very low incomes, and 611 are to be priced for people with low incomes.

Supervisor Stephanie Moulton-Peters said, “There is a perfect storm right now between these very elevated Regional Housing Need Allocation numbers and the advent of SB 35.

“The interplay is simply. If you don’t reach your numbers you are subject to the SB 35 ministerial approvals for projects coming up,” Moulton-Peters said, “which really does take local decision-making out of land use planning. It is a very frightening scenario.”

Under SB 35, any municipality or county that fails to build the amount of housing assigned to it by ABAG is subject to a streamlined approval process for new housing projects.

According to state housing officials, only two Marin municipalities — Mill Valley and Corte Madera —  built enough housing during the last eight years to make them exempt from SB 35.

In December, the county’s Community Development Agency approved a five-story, 74-apartment complex on a 1.1-acre lot in Marin City without review by the county Planning Commission or lengthy environmental analysis under the California Environmental Quality Act due to SB 35.

AMG & Associates LLC of Encino, the developer of the Marin City project, has also proposed building a six-story building at 1020 Fourth St. in Novato that would include commercial space on the first floor and 227 apartments on the upper floors.

The Board of Supervisors has written three letters objecting to ABAG’s new housing mandates.

In a Nov. 13 letter to Berkeley Mayor Jesse Arreguin, who serves as ABAG’s president, Supervisor Katie Rice wrote, “With an increase of this magnitude, the county may not be able to adopt a compliant housing element unless we put housing in environmentally sensitive areas, prone to fires, flooding and sea level rise.”

“In light of recent fire events, it is important to address fire hazards,” Rice wrote. “Many unincorporated communities are considered ‘Communities at Risk’ by the National Fire Plan because of the proximity of housing to areas susceptible to wildland fires.”

Rice stated that many of the roads to access these areas are private, narrow and substandard.

“New land uses and development could expose people and structures to wildland fires throughout the county,” she wrote, “especially in areas with steep slopes, high fuel loads or inadequate emergency access.”

Moulton-Peters said she had attended her first ABAG meeting the previous week and that representatives from Sonoma and Solano counties also expressed concern that the new mandates would push development into rural areas.

Moulton-Peters said such a policy would be contrary to the founding mission of Plan Bay Area.

Approved initially in 2013, Plan Bay Area’s main purpose is to reduce greenhouse gas emissions by channeling housing and job growth along existing traffic corridors, near mass transit, jobs, shopping and other services.

Plan Bay Area is updated every four years, however, and the latest iteration of the plan also identifies “high resource areas” where it recommends that increased housing development should be created.

As defined by the California Department of Housing and Community Development and the California Tax Credit Allocation Committee, “high resource areas” are neighborhoods with characteristics and resources most associated with positive educational and long-term economic outcomes for low-income children. These include: low poverty rates and high educational attainment, employment rates, home values and school test scores.

The number of high resource areas in Marin is one of the primary reasons that the county’s share of housing in the 2022 to 2030 cycle grew more than those of most other Bay Area counties.

According to Daniel Saver, the Metropolitan Transportation Commission’s assistant director for housing and local planning, the incorporation of “high resource/opportunity areas” into Plan Bay Area’s equation was required because of Assembly Bill 686, which mandated that counties and cities implement the Obama-era policy of “affirmatively furthering fair housing.”

ABAG chose to align itself with this “high resource area strategy.”

Leelee Thomas, a Marin County planning manager, said that while complying with the housing mandate will be a challenge, the county is in desperate need of more affordable housing.

“Marin continues to have one of the highest median incomes in the state,” Thomas said, “but meanwhile many of our working families and seniors are struggling to meet their basic housing needs.

“Marin continues to present the starkest inequities related to housing throughout the Bay Area. About two-thirds of non-Hispanic White residents are homeowners, and roughly three-fourths of both Black and Hispanic households are renters.”

Supervisor Dennis Rodoni said, however, “We don’t build houses. It is developers who build houses. It is still very expensive to build in Marin.”

Thomas said jurisdictions will get a chance to appeal the housing mandates this summer, but she said the county must file its compliance plan by January 2023 and will proceed in the meantime on the assumption that nothing will change.